Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ito noizi 1.5k

Copyright

  • ? flyable heart 157

Characters

  • ? inaba yui 69
  • ? katsuragi shou 17

General

  • ? 1boy 1.6M
  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? ahoge 745k
  • ? back 102k
  • ? bed 117k
  • ? between breasts 53k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breast smother 2.2k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? censored 515k
  • ? closed eyes 814k
  • ? completely nude 217k
  • ? dutch angle 132k
  • ? face to breasts 3.0k
  • ? flower 705k
  • ? girl on top 72k
  • ? glowing 114k
  • ? hair ornament 1.6M
  • ? hairclip 377k
  • ? happy sex 17k
  • ? hetero 611k
  • ? hug 137k
  • ? mosaic censoring 228k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? nipples 922k
  • ? nude 554k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? penis 464k
  • ? pussy 408k
  • ? sex 303k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? small breasts 558k
  • ? straddling 79k
  • ? upright straddle 5.9k
  • ? vaginal 222k

Meta

  • ? game cg 87k
  • ? highres 6.1M

Information

  • ID: 747160
  • Uploader: CountPacula »
  • Date: almost 15 years ago
  • Approver: Bloodletter »
  • Size: 334 KB .jpg (1600x1200) »
  • Source:
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 67
  • Favorites: 201
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 53% of original (view original)
inaba yui and katsuragi shou (flyable heart) drawn by ito_noizi
  • ‹ prev Search: user:CountPacula next ›
  • « ‹ prev Pool: Making Love next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    CountPacula
    almost 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    While being quite close to the line, this image is not explicit enough to warrant rating:e.

    Following the guidelines in howto:rate, this seemed to be the applicable section: "Actual intercourse, if portrayed in a restrained and tasteful manner". Nothing is blatantly exposed, and the focus is on the act, and not the explicit anatomical details, hence I believe that rating:q is the appropriate rating.

    -4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    sgcdonmai
    almost 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    CountPacula said:
    While being quite close to the line, this image is not explicit enough to warrant rating:e.

    I disagree. The image may be pleasant and tasteful, but it is still explicit erotica. Both parties' bodies are on full display, with the point of genital insertion being fully exposed (albeit mosaic censored).
    That is most certainly within the guidelines of rating:e.

    6 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /