It's my first post here. My first image as well. It's not an excellent image, by no means, but I am testing the system. I won't test it more, I just wanted to check how things work and if I am allowed to post content that is not inspired from an existing artist. She, for example, is Clarissa. It's a character of mine. I hope to post her story even if it's nothing breathtaking or that interesting. I think I'll try to have bubble speech and legend boxes etc. I already illustrated her on a different website but a good part of the images went missing after a disagreement with the staff. If you stumble upon her... Well, I use a similar pseudo there. I don't want to advertise this other website though.
I just wanted to check how things work and if I am allowed to post content that is not inspired from an existing artist.
AI-generated works are, in fact, "inspired" from many existing artists, and are not allowed on this site. Click the gold text in this comment for more information. You can learn more about what it and isn't allowed by referring to help:upload rules.
Thanks for the tips. I have been using that website for a moment now, mainly because it seems several people trained models with the images from here (and their tags), so it's a nice place to find new tags to try in the prompts. By "testing the system" I did just that. I learn the interface, if it's possible to edit the tags (yes) if I can post content generated by ai (yes and no, but with the story and the speech bubble with actual text in them it should be more yes, I suppose) , etc.
I tagged the image when I posted it, imperfectly for sure (even if I am not sure changing red_pupils by red_eyes was relevant), but I tried. I am happy to learn :)
I don't know if hot links are allowed for example. (eg, linking the image so it displays on a different website - where I could host the story etc.)
If I bake all the text in the image I don't have much more to do, but I think a touch of JS to do the speech bubbles dynamically would be nice and would preserve the original image if anyone wants to download it in its untouched form. I saw some posts are actually several images. Maybe I can upload the two versions of the image, a jpeg+bubble speech (so edited manually, should conform to the rules) + the untouched version in PNG. Jpeg means smaller file size at the cost of lower quality.
Thanks for the tips. I have been using that website for a moment now, mainly because it seems several people trained models with the images from here (and their tags), so it's a nice place to find new tags to try in the prompts. By "testing the system" I did just that. I learn the interface, if it's possible to edit the tags (yes) if I can post content generated by ai (yes and no, but with the story and the speech bubble with actual text in them it should be more yes, I suppose) , etc.
I tagged the image when I posted it, imperfectly for sure (even if I am not sure changing red_pupils by red_eyes was relevant), but I tried. I am happy to learn :)
I don't know if hot links are allowed for example. (eg, linking the image so it displays on a different website - where I could host the story etc.)
If I bake all the text in the image I don't have much more to do, but I think a touch of JS to do the speech bubbles dynamically would be nice and would preserve the original image if anyone wants to download it in its untouched form. I saw some posts are actually several images. Maybe I can upload the two versions of the image, a jpeg+bubble speech (so edited manually, should conform to the rules) + the untouched version in PNG. Jpeg means smaller file size at the cost of lower quality.
Anyway. I am eager to learn.
There is no yes and no. DO NOT post AI-generated art here.
In that case a great place where you can experiment would be https://aibooru.online/, a very similar website that's actually run by a few people from here where this stuff is allowed and prompts are shared.
Thanks for the link. And according to ai-generated
"This tag applies to fully AI-generated images, that is, images that underwent no edits or extremely minor retouchings. For edited images, see AI-assisted."
And "Uploading fully AI-generated art to Danbooru is against the upload rules;"
In both cases the emphasis is put on fully AI-generated. Maybe I do not understand something but there is no need to be aggressive here. I followed the tag ai-generated (I initially tagged the image "stable diffusion", not ai-generated - I didn't know). It says this, hence my _comment_ (I didn't post other images).
I'll definitely give aibooru a try. This name sounds promising.
