I wouldn't have flagged this for deletion solely on the grounds of the man. Seems to me that in most sex pics, the emphasis is not on the graphic sharpness or visual appeal of the male anyway. Indeed, a better-drawn "ugly_man" is no different than what I see here.
Reason: "The guy is poorly drawn" ....oh-kay, so you're looking at the guy instead of the whole picture?
And how's the guy's poorly drawn? If this is poorly drawn, then all kinds of sketches must be badly drawn in your eyes, huh. I almost laugh at your reasoning. How about you flagged it because of: "The hair ornament isn't supposed to do that", or "The girl isn't as poorly drawn as the guy"? I'm sorry, I'm a bit upset.
Then again the guy flagging this for deletion is also the same guy who posted it. He probably wanted this taken down and used that as a filler reason. Since he's a contributor and can't do it himself he has to have it flagged instead.
Overall though I'm in agreement with the other commentators that unless it really is "that bad" the guy(or any other off-screen appendages) should be given some leeway in terms of quality scrutiny.