I think fanarts where the character is clearly talking to someone (whether it's a man or a woman) should be tagged as "implied Yuri," "implied hetero," or something like that. I'm a fan of the Pulchra x Burnice ship myself, but I’d never find that kind of content by searching, just like I’ve come across fanarts I didn’t like—where she was clearly talking to a guy.

Sorasake said:

I think fanarts where the character is clearly talking to someone (whether it's a man or a woman) should be tagged as "implied Yuri," "implied hetero," or something like that. I'm a fan of the Pulchra x Burnice ship myself, but I’d never find that kind of content by searching, just like I’ve come across fanarts I didn’t like—where she was clearly talking to a guy.

So you expect us to adhere to your yuri ships, when you yourself can't adhere to people's hetero ships?

Myth-of-Stars said:

So you expect us to adhere to your yuri ships, when you yourself can't adhere to people's hetero ships?

I never asked anyone to 'adhere' to my ships. What I suggested was that fanarts with visibly romantic or flirtatious interactions should be properly tagged, regardless of the genders involved. That makes it easier for people to find or avoid certain content — I’ve personally been caught off guard by unexpected heterosexual interactions before. This should apply both ways.

Even if I don't look at them, I'm not saying heterosexual fanarts shouldn't exist — I'm saying they should be properly tagged. Just like I'd love for some clearly yuri content to be easier to find with accurate tags, you get me?

If you're misunderstanding my comments, I apologize. I don’t speak English and rely on Google Translate to communicate."