Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Copyright

  • ? azumanga daioh 3.0k

Character

  • ? takino tomo 474

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? animal ears 1.3M
  • ? animal nose 17k
  • ? body fur 26k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown eyes 914k
  • ? brown fur 11k
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? furrification 2.4k
  • ? furry 94k
  • ? furry female 44k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? parted lips 563k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? simple background 2.1M
  • ? small breasts 550k
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? werewolf 2.0k
  • ? wolf ears 90k
  • ? wolf girl 36k

Meta

  • ? highres 6.1M
  • ? non-web source 115k
  • ? third-party edit 25k
  • ? ↳ third-party extraction 671

Information

  • ID: 9385227
  • Uploader: Clover0056 »
  • Date: about 1 month ago
  • Size: 22.7 KB .webp (1080x1210) »
  • Source: file://IMG_2239.webp
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: -7
  • Favorites: 0
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days (about 1 month ago)
Resized to 78% of original (view original)
takino tomo (azumanga daioh)
  • ‹ prev Search: third-party_extraction status:deleted status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • [deleted]
    about 1 month ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    Deleted by Clover0056 about 1 month ago

    Blank User
    about 1 month ago
    [hidden]

    Clover0056 said:

    This is an edit I made, isn’t she kyuute? <3

    These kind of third-party edits are against the rules.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    [deleted]
    about 1 month ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    Deleted by Clover0056 about 1 month ago

    Clover0056
    about 1 month ago
    [hidden]

    Blank_User said:how can you delete it from the website? I want to delete it from the website.

    These kind of third-party edits are against the rules.

    Updated by Clover0056 about 1 month ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Clover0056
    about 1 month ago
    [hidden]

    Clover0056 said:but why are the third party edits against the rules?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Blank User
    about 1 month ago
    [hidden]

    Clover0056 said:

    Please don't spam comments. You can edit your previous comment if you need to (and be careful where you're putting your words so you don't accidently misattribute your own words as mine).

    Most third-party edits that substantially change the image like this clash badly with the original art, and this is no exception. The solid color of the fur is noticeable against the blurry and heavily-artifacted art from the low-quality screencap. The outlines are uneven and equally artifacted due to the fact that the original art is, again, a low-quality screencap. Even higher-quality edits will run into the same problem.

    If you've ever seen fan-made video games that use sprites from NES, SNES, Playstation, Game Boy, and others, all at the same time, combined with bland backgrounds and generic realistic explosions, then you should understand the issue with these.

    We want high-quality art on this site, preferably in its original state. We only permit third-party edits if there's a very good reason to, mainly if there's no better existing version of the post. And they must not substantially alter the image. Even then, they'll be looked at with higher scrutiny than normal. However, a sloppy extraction like this will never be accepted here.

    Updated by Blank User about 1 month ago

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /