Updated by a moderator
Posted under General
Updated by a moderator
post #9576802 https://gall.dcinside.com/mgallery/board/view?id=projectmx&no=15582821 asset #27748327 accidentally upped what is most likely an image sample with the upload to danbooru extension. whoops
Updated by a moderator
Damian0358 said:
post #9561182
https://archive.is/rxwQSI got tipped off that the post's asset wasn't actually :orig.
@Damian0358 - I don't have confidence that an archived catbox image is an orig either.
RaisingK said:
@Damian0358 - I don't have confidence that an archived catbox image is an orig either.
Oh wait, that's the wrong link. I had asked if they had one of the Twitter original, and they sent me https://archive.is/AVtW7.
Updated by a moderator
Reposting as I got no reply when I posted this 25 day ago:
Riot provided higher res. Not a revision.
Additionally please replace source and image in below post with asset
As the source is completely wrong, whereas the new one is officially provided by riot games and not some fucking smurf website + higher res.
post #8734741
asset #27790623
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/shining-nikki/images/7/76/Lilith_-_Sweet_Innocence_visual.png/revision/latest?cb=20230510051847
post #8692133
asset #27791664
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/shining-nikki/images/9/9a/Lilith_-_Starsnow_Icing_Visual.png/revision/latest?cb=20211223141032
Updated by Knowledge Seeker
post #4626246
asset #27790814
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/shining-nikki/images/c/c4/Yuka_and_Jax_-_Fairytale_Aroma_Visual.png/revision/latest?cb=20211124175412
post #4626170
asset #27790824
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/shining-nikki/images/e/e5/Yuka_and_Jax_-_Midnight_Aroma_Visual.png/revision/latest?cb=20211124181350
These too.
@Knowledge_Seeker - Third-party either way; I'm not sure about these.
post #9595593 asset #27811912 Third-party source and crop -> original (the PNG is lossy-lossless and has strong JPEG artifacts not present in the original)
P.S.: Do you prefer asset links like this or direct cdn.donmai.us and source links for replacement?
Updated by a moderator
The original post by the second-party source; it has the benefit of including the character's name, a brief description/commentary on the concept behind the illustration, and attribution to the artist who drew it. Also, it's slightly bigger in file size, so maybe it's less lossy(?).
post #9607567 https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1939302833809195375
post #9565745 https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1940247346710978600
post #9565712 https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1924084232034615791
post #9565711 https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1924084216444367032
post #9565710 https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1924084195196023195
post #9342210 https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1917562055697260762
post #9342199 https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1910671081633099887
lossy-lossless second-party source -> not lossy-lossless second-party source
Updated by a moderator
Nameless_Contributor said:
P.S.: Do you prefer asset links like this or direct cdn.donmai.us and source links for replacement?
@Nameless_Contributor - I prefer the original direct + indirect links (e.g. https://i.pximg.net/img-original/img/2020/02/01/11/00/20/79210991_p0.jpg and https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/79210991) when possible, like the example in the start of this thread. If not that, I'll take the asset link.
MarqFJA87 said:
The original post by the second-party source; it has the benefit of including the character's name, a brief description/commentary on the concept behind the illustration, and attribution to the artist who drew it. Also, it's slightly bigger in file size, so maybe it's less lossy(?).
@MarqFJA87 - Both twitter sources give me "does not exist", and the pixel hash is the same anyway.
asgembed said:
post #8415103
asset #27925982
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1C8DUY5EGB/
@asgembed - Asset is corrupt, won't play.
RaisingK said:
@MarqFJA87 - Both twitter sources give me "does not exist", and the pixel hash is the same anyway.
What are you talking about? I can access both sources just fine.
But if the two images are identical as you say and thus there's no point in replacement... Is it alright to replace the source link and commentary, then? I don't know if there is any particular process for this.
post #9382620 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GvfB-YKXUAAVyXm?format=jpg&name=large The version on the Artist's Twitter lacks the compression on his Reddit upload
