Bastille said:
And post #160572?
I recall an earlier decision (can't remember if it was in this thread or not, and can't be arsed to search) where a hand just under the waistband of the undergarments was not considered suggestive enough. This one, I'm leaning a lot more towards the tag applying, due to the multitude of other signs suggesting she's about one second away from masturbating, but I'll defer to others' judgment on this.
post #544909: The depiction is only a pantyshot, but the text elevates it to strongly suggestive.
post #386415: Borderline. She's visibly pantyless, but nothing is shown, and the pose says "shyness" more than "come get it".
post #361380: This is a different story. The leg-embrace and topless Rika make it too suggestive not to tag.
post #172511: no panties aside, I don't think this one's very suggestive in tone. Still, I wouldn't remove the tag, thanks to Satoko's state of dress.
post #159438: Not even close. Removed.
post #159436: This, even less than the previous.
post #159434: Same, and someone must have been screwing around to rate that Explicit.
post #81037: Creepy, and a bit suggestive. I'd say leave it.
post #57063: The pose and camera POV are pretty sexual.
post #53718: Just a pantyshot.
post #40566: The chest-grope and heavy breathing by Miyo... yeah, that's pretty blatant. It stays for this one.
post #480693: Pantyshot, nothing more.
12 is fine. "Ten" is a guideline; just try to keep it close to that.