Reason: It's mentioned in the definition that two side up is a type of twintails.
Updated by a moderator
Posted under General
Reason: It's mentioned in the definition that two side up is a type of twintails.
Updated by a moderator
-1. They're both visually distinct. Now that we've implemented the two_side_up tag, I would separate it from twintails, leaving twintails for instances where the bulk of the hair is done up (e.g. Hatsune Miku).
Hillside_Moose said:
They're both visually distinct.
I would separate it from twintails, leaving twintails
In that case the wiki definition ought to be changed to make the distinction more clear then.
Edit:
Alright, changed it a bit. Hopefully that makes it more clear.
Updated by Anonymous9000
I would think that both tags could apply, but it would depend on the prominence of the twintails. Most of what would fall in Toosaka_Rin two_side_up probably deserves twintails as well. Something like post #1039274 deserves two_side_up, but not twintails.
+1,
After a quick look through the tags, I couldn't find images of anything not looking like twintails/ short twintails + long hair.
It would be helpful if someone could translate the nicopedia article: ツーサイドアップ
I believe the "up" part of the definition is kinda lost on danbooru.
Shinjidude said:
I would think that both tags could apply, but it would depend on the prominence of the twintails. Most of what would fall in Toosaka_Rin two_side_up probably deserves twintails as well. Something like post #1039274 deserves two_side_up, but not twintails.
Rin isn't what I would call prominent either. Here are two great examples I've found:
Again, I find it more useful for twintail and two_side_up to have solid boundaries by judging how much of the bulk of the hair is contributing to the style; people can then pick the proper tag they're thinking of. An implication would especially harm searches for the second example.