Reason: A straightforward concept. Bondage shared by multiple people.
P.S.: The pool has only 15 posts; it can be converted very easily, even manually. The current description of the pool includes this piece of text: "Two girls connected to each other [...]". I'm just ignoring that restriction of gender. If it becomes important in the future, then we can just search for shared_bondage + multiple_girls or something like this.
EDIT: just realized the search would include even those with only one partner tied. so yes, for a new tag, if this is necessary. how about mutual bondage?
I think "mutual" implies that all the "partners" are tied together. If this is correct, then post #163795 could be tagged shared bondage, but not mutual bondage.
Relatedly, I've filled shared bondage with all the posts I could quickly find, including the ones from that whole pool. But this new tag can be renamed to anything else if needed, naturally.
My interpretation would be that mutual bondage would be a situation where one character is bound by another, but the situation is conceptual (rather than being forcibly restrained).
Shared bondage doesn't have an intuitive interpretation to me, so it could mean multiple people tied to one another. I almost like the original title, bound together, better for that though. It seems more obvious as to what it means.
Shinjidude said: Shared bondage doesn't have an intuitive interpretation to me, so it could mean multiple people tied to one another. I almost like the original title, bound together, better for that though. It seems more obvious as to what it means.
You don't seem very enthusiastic about bound together. Do you, or someone else, have a better name in mind?
Danielx21 said: You don't seem very enthusiastic about bound together. Do you, or someone else, have a better name in mind?
I think bound_together is a good tag name. We should use it unless someone else has a problem with it. I just tend to hedge things if I don't feel a change is absolutely necessary. I would prefer we use that name rather than shared_bondage