A form of cheating in which someone close to the protagonist is either willingly or unwillingly seduced and stolen away. This isn't necessarily limited to one's lover, but may also include friends, unrequited love interests, or even relatives.
As the wiki states: I think the netorare tag should stay on this picture, even tough I don´t fully agree with the wiki myself.
Is it appropriate to tag this flat_chest? With her posture you would be able to see some of her breasts unless she was flat (which she is, canonically), and on similar images with similar posture where the character is NOT flat, breast tags certainly apply. e.g. post #3771478
Is it appropriate to tag this flat_chest? With her posture you would be able to see some of her breasts unless she was flat (which she is, canonically), and on similar images with similar posture where the character is NOT flat, breast tags certainly apply. e.g. post #3771478
Following the principle of "Tag what you see", I'd say that certainly qualifies as flat chest. Her chest is completely flat, there's not a hint of breasts, so it amply falls within the definition of that tag.
Following the principle of "Tag what you see", I'd say that certainly qualifies as flat chest. Her chest is completely flat, there's not a hint of breasts, so it amply falls within the definition of that tag.
Thanks for clarifying. It's one of those amusing cases of tag what you don't see though, I feel. I'll add it.
What's the best way to tag the quilted texture of Komodo Dragon's outfit? The clothes in post #3021921 and post #3665567 have a similar appearance. We have a sparse quilted_coat tag but it would be nice to have a tag that's useful for more than just coats.
Is there a tag for when artists denote that they don't want their works reposted/used without permission?
Haven't seen any other cases right in the picture like that, since they're usually in the commentary, but maybe something like repost notice can be created for when it's in the picture.
howto:rate says "Clearly visible sexual fluids (cum and pussy juice)." should be tagged explicit, but pussy_juice -rating:-e has a count of 4898. Is this not the rule anymore or has it always been just a suggestion that you're free to ignore?
howto:rate says "Clearly visible sexual fluids (cum and pussy juice)." should be tagged explicit, but pussy_juice -rating:e has a count of 4898. Is this not the rule anymore or has it always been just a suggestion that you're free to ignore?
The rule is still in place, just people mistagging/misrating.
