How do I tag this?

post #5891231

Does this really count as hug?

Unbreakable said:

post #5891231

Does this really count as hug?

I don't think so? It's just the same piggyback from post #5891230 from behind, right?

accidental self-reply

Shinjidude said:

I don't think so? It's just the same piggyback from post #5891230 from behind, right?

Yeah, I only asked because the same user re-added it when I removed it the first time.

No, the girl doing the carrying is clearly facing the opposite direction. Notice the position of the tail and the way her knees bend.

Is it safe to assume that projected inset should be used only when different characters are shown? Like for instance, these posts:

post #5842844
post #5824227
post #5794834

should've been tagged multiple views instead of projected inset?

Talulah said:

No, the girl doing the carrying is clearly facing the opposite direction. Notice the position of the tail and the way her knees bend.

Even backwards though, I'm not sure I'd call it a hug. Still more carrying person.

Should conjoined characters be tagged as one person or be tagged per head (ie. 1girl or 2girls for post #358623)?
My gut says tag per head, but tagging post #358623 post #5784179 as 5others seems wrong.

Omo_Fan said:

Should conjoined characters be tagged as one person or be tagged per head (ie. 1girl or 2girls for post #358623)?
My gut says tag per head, but tagging post #358623 as 5others seems wrong.

Lots of other conjoined posts seem to tag them per head so I'd say it's the latter.

Also why 5others?

Fhtagn said:

Lots of other conjoined posts seem to tag them per head so I'd say it's the latter.

Also why 5others?

Oops, I linked to the wrong post. I meant post #5784179, which has 5 heads.
post #1622827 is another interesting case, but maybe that one shouldn't be tagged conjoined.

post #475013, post #2354393

Are these animal ear headphones or mechanical ears?

Omo_Fan said:

Oops, I linked to the wrong post. I meant post #5784179, which has 5 heads.

I may be biased (as well as not knowing the original work) but for such a monster character that barely looks human, I think 1other and multiple heads should suffice.

post #1622827 is another interesting case, but maybe that one shouldn't be tagged conjoined.

According to the wiki, that character's "literally half-man (left side) and half-woman (right side)", so it should be definitely tagged conjoined.

Maybe even tag it asymmetrical clothes too with the way he/she is dressed.

Do we have a tag for phone screens used to "uncensor" or show genitals like post #5898251, post #1032503? We have a few similar posts in reverse x-ray but it's not the same.

Why was the lineup tag deleted on post #5397260? Isn't it an instance of lineup sex?

post #4751111

I deleted an old comment of mine, but still, is that a shota?

Individual said:

post #4751111

I deleted an old comment of mine, but still, is that a shota?

Technically for danbooru standards, I would just label it onee-shota

Excuse me, do you think that removed attire-related tags like dress removed, headwear removed or such should also be used in posts that has dress-up kisekae theme like post #5903306?

nonamethanks said:

Do we have a tag for phone screens used to "uncensor" or show genitals like post #5898251, post #1032503? We have a few similar posts in reverse x-ray but it's not the same.

X-ray vision can be used for devices capable of seeing through. Augmented reality can be used for real-time AI.

solesole said:

Why was the lineup tag deleted on post #5397260? Isn't it an instance of lineup sex?

I think, a lineup must have more than two people lined up. The tag still exists on post #1045540 and post #912391 though.

Lineup gets removed from posts where the characters aren't aligned accordingly. Here's the history.

Is there any tag that specifically refers to those high collars in fashion that are designed to cover the mouth?
like in post #5765680
even if i've already have tagged both covered mouth and high collar