Danbooru

Cum on stomach implications

Posted under Tags

I think cum on upper body and cum on lower body should be nuked (aliased into cum on body) and common fetish tags like cum on feet and cum on armpits should be unaliased, as long as they're relevant and not dumb things like cum on knees or whatever.

Cum on upper body and cum on lower body are garbage tags, nobody has an upper body or a lower body fetish. They're useless for fetishists because they're too broad for specific fetishes like armpits or feet, and they're useless for non-fetishists because normal people don't care about this upper versus lower body distinction.

Ironically, these upper/lower body tags don't reduce bloat, they increase it. For a cum on breasts post, instead of having just cum on breasts + cum on body, we get cum on breasts + cum on upper body + cum on body. Three tags instead of two. For cum everywhere posts, instead of having a single cum on body tag, we get three cum on body + cum on upper body + cum on lower body tags. This increases the tags per post, not reduces it.

nonamethanks said:

BUR #3701 has been approved by @evazion.

remove alias cum_on_back -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_on_belly -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_on_armpit -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_on_armpits -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_in_armpit -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_on_ear -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_on_hands -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_on_feet -> cum_on_lower_body
remove alias cum_on_foot -> cum_on_lower_body

I would argue that cum on back and cum on ear aren't necessary tags, but we can unalias them and see what happens.

evazion said:

I think cum on upper body and cum on lower body should be nuked (aliased into cum on body) and common fetish tags like cum on feet and cum on armpits should be unaliased, as long as they're relevant and not dumb things like cum on knees or whatever.

Complete agreement.

MyrMindservant said:

Cum_on_armpit and cum_on_feet are two specific tags for well known fetishes (armpit fetish and foot fetish), so they definitely should be separated.

Cum_on_stomach is already in use, so moving cum_on_belly alias to it is just a technicality. It won't increase the number of active tags.

Two other tags that I think should be separated are cum_on_back and cum_on_thighs. Cum on back is quite similar to cum on stomach, just the preceding sex position is different. And cum on thighs is related to several fetishes like cumdrip and thigh_sex. But it seems like these two have less support.

Fully in support of these.

Same is true for cum_in_hands and cum_on_hands, moving the alias won't inflate the number of tags in use.
Btw, I think that cum_in_hands is a better name for the tag since it's more specific. Cum_on_hands can be misunderstood to mean that it is for cum anywhere on the hand, which is not what we need.

Iffy on this. I don't really see why we specifically don't need a tag for general cum on hands. Hands are a very prominent and focused body part, I'm sure there's just as many people that want to see hands with cum on them as there are people for cum on any other "major" body part.

I don't think there's anything wrong with cum in hands, but the rest of these tags are just about cum being on things, cum in hands is for a very specific pose. I feel like cum in hands and cum on hands could coexist just fine.

BUR #3710 has been approved by @evazion.

remove alias cum_on_chest -> cum_on_upper_body
remove alias cum_on_thigh -> cum_on_lower_body
remove alias cum_on_thighs -> cum_on_lower_body
create alias cum_on_upper_body -> cum_on_body
create alias cum_on_lower_body -> cum_on_body

Final set from the discussion.

It's going to take a lot of work to fix the years of having these tags but better now than never.

ps. The various cum_in vs cum_on and plural variants aren't in need of fix after being dealiased because of the autocomplete.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3710 (forum #174586) has been approved by @evazion.

Updated by DanbooruBot

1 2