The bulk update request #15326 is pending approval.
create alias breast_cutout -> breastless_clothes
same thing, breast cutout is just redundant as a separate tag
Updated
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #15326 is pending approval.
create alias breast_cutout -> breastless_clothes
same thing, breast cutout is just redundant as a separate tag
Updated
breastless clothes seems like a padding tag. It gets tagged on stuff like post #6073556, post #6067519, post #5989099, post #5924520, post #5924050 and so on. It's a real mess.
I'd either alias breastless clothes to breast cutout or deprecate it, because otherwise it's just breasts out.
The bulk update request #15356 is pending approval.
create alias breastless_clothes -> breast_cutout
nonamethanks said:
breastless clothes seems like a padding tag. It gets tagged on stuff like post #6073556, post #6067519, post #5989099, post #5924520, post #5924050 and so on. It's a real mess.
I'd either alias breastless clothes to breast cutout or deprecate it, because otherwise it's just breasts out.
good point, didn't realize it was so common for people to tag it on obvious cases like shrug
so as suggested, reverse alias request
Not all of them are cutouts, ex. post #5200153. breastless clothes was intentionally broad to fit any otherwise-normal clothes that deliberately didn't cover the breasts.
so it's either an implication or something else?
A breast_cutout -> breastless_clothes implication might work, but I've noticed someone tagging breast_cutout on i-13_(kancolle) posts, when framed_breasts would've been more appropriate.
Hillside_Moose said:
A breast_cutout -> breastless_clothes implication might work, but I've noticed someone tagging breast_cutout on i-13_(kancolle) posts, when framed_breasts would've been more appropriate.
to be honest i didn't even know myself about the existence of the framed breasts tag, also not sure if it is an issue as the framed_breasts wiki says it can overlap with breastless clothes, implying that breastless_clothes (and therefore also breast cutout) can also apply to cases where the breasts are still covered by another garment/fabric, unless i'm misunderstanding it and the actual cases where both framed breasts and breastless clothes apply are only the ones that have bare uncovered breasts within breast_cutout specifically?
Isn't the whole point of framed breasts that the breasts are not exposed? In which case the overlap only exists where breastless clothes are worn over some other clothing which covered the breasts - basically where the framing effect comes from two different pieces of clothing rather than one.
that's what i was assuming