BUR #23817 has been rejected.
create implication partially_unwrapped_candy -> candy
create implication partially_unwrapped_candy -> candy_wrapper
This one is obvious to lol
Posted under Tags
BUR #23817 has been rejected.
create implication partially_unwrapped_candy -> candy
create implication partially_unwrapped_candy -> candy_wrapper
This one is obvious to lol
Why do we have both candy wrapper and wrapped candy? This seems overkill.
nonamethanks said:
Why do we have both candy wrapper and wrapped candy? This seems overkill.
A candy wrapper can appear in an image completely by itself, such as in post #6340782, without any candy inside of it, so a distinction between that state and when the wrapper is still on the candy (completely or partially) seems needed.
Of course, that doesn't account for when an unwrapped wrapper appears in an image with wrapped candy (ex. post #4134832) or with partially unwrapped candy (ex. post #6152882).
Damian0358 said:
A candy wrapper can appear in an image completely by itself, such as in post #6340782, without any candy inside of it, so a distinction between that state and when the wrapper is still on the candy (completely or partially) seems needed.
The problem is that candy wrapper is not for empty candy wrappers, right now it's used on any visible candy wrapper, and this BUR wants to encourage this usage. Do we need to rename it to empty candy wrapper?
I also just noticed that the two BURs are referencing two different tags: candy wrapper and wrapper.
nonamethanks said:
The problem is that candy wrapper is not for empty candy wrappers, right now it's used on any visible candy wrapper, and this BUR wants to encourage this usage. Do we need to rename it to empty candy wrapper?
If you would rather there not be an umbrella tag for candy wrappers in general, and just have separate wrapped candy, partially unwrapped candy and empty candy wrapper tags, then that would be one way of approaching things. But right now there's over 1k posts under candy_wrapper -wrapped_candy (and over 600 posts under wrapped_candy -candy_wrapper) right now, which suggests that straight-up renaming candy wrapper would probably not be practical.
nonamethanks said:
I also just noticed that the two BURs are referencing two different tags: candy wrapper and wrapper.
I wonder how undertagged wrapper is due to its ambiguous name.
The bulk update request #23817 (forum #270933) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #23834 (forum #270972) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.