Posted under General
Eletric said:
I’m mainly wondering how post #6231618 is poor quality. If you ask me, it’s one of the better “on the water” themed artworks I’ve seen.
I also acknowledge that there is a signature, but I’d hardly consider it to be an “obnoxious water mark.”
Only one out of fifteen thought it was poor quality so I wouldn't stress about it. Though her arms look like they're two different sizes so I'd assume that's what the one guy was looking at.
Eletric said:
I’m mainly wondering how post #6231618 is poor quality. If you ask me, it’s one of the better “on the water” themed artworks I’ve seen.
I also acknowledge that there is a signature, but I’d hardly consider it to be an “obnoxious water mark.”
i don't think it's that major of an issue but her neck is an obvious flaw of the image, it makes her whole face look off even though the face on it's own doesnt look bad
zetsubousensei said:
Only one out of fifteen thought it was poor quality so I wouldn't stress about it. Though her arms look like they're two different sizes so I'd assume that's what the one guy was looking at.
Mayhem-Chan said:
i don't think it's that major of an issue but her neck is an obvious flaw of the image, it makes her whole face look off even though the face on it's own doesnt look bad
I see. Thanks for the feedback!
Soberoatmeal said:
Need some feedback for this one, as it might probably not gonna be approved on time.
post #6226445Might be because it's a cropped part of the full-body shot in the parent image, but it has way bigger resolution compared to the parent one, hence why I also upload it in the first place. Any general rules for uploading this kind of works ?
Need someone to take a look over this one, please.
Might as well need some feedback for this one too, in the mean time.
post #6235005
Mayhem-Chan said:
kittey already responded over this one on the previous page
I'm going to appeal these two posts and need second opinion on that one as I already add chromatic_aberration before and some arts with the same tag got approved.
These images are very well-drawn and are fanarts of a popular character. They are redraws of post #5688075 and post #6112079. The artist declared using AI for "correction", but judging from the resolution, the details, and the brushstrokes, most of the work is obviously done by a human. I believe they deserve to be approved, but they aren't. Why is that?
Updated
Can I have some feedback on why post #6235450 wasn't approved?
Soberoatmeal said:
Might as well need some feedback for this one too, in the mean time.
post #6235005I'm going to appeal these two posts and need second opinion on that one as I already add chromatic_aberration before and some arts with the same tag got approved.
i dont see any dealbreaker with post #6235005 , it's not great but looks fine
8253803 said:
These images are very well-drawn and are fanarts of a popular character. They are redraws of post #5688075 and post #6112079. The artist declared using AI for "correction", but judging from the resolution, the details, and the brushstrokes, most of the work is obviously done by a human. I believe they deserve to be approved, but they aren't. Why is that?
topic #22285 is the more appropriate place to discuss if you think it counts as ai-assisted and nor ai-generated, but keep in mind standards are still, for good reasons, a lot more strict for ai-assisted stuff anyway
muccos said:
Can I have some feedback on why post #6235450 wasn't approved?
looks fine imo
post #6234215 was not approved yet the other three in the set were. What was the reason?
Hello, I'd like some feedback on what holds these two posts back, thank you.
post #6221092
post #6016848
Updated
Halo!
I haven't uploaded in a while but I was wondering if
Would be likely to get approved.
I've added the post as a child and intend to post the full gallery if they get approved, however, I do understand that it is a rather old doujin and may not meet modern Danbooru standards so I've been holding off and posting these two pages as a way to test the waters so to speak.
am i ve received some posts deleted for no apparent reason, even so am i respect the opinions of others
the posts are
post #6237053
post #6237068
post #6223429
post #6223410
post #6223397
post #6036212
post #5777355
post #5550275
@Nuntokki Posts are always deleted for a reason. In this case, it'd be more accurate to say "My posts weren't approved".
Besides post #6223397 (a little barren and strange), post #6223429 (not a style i vibe with but it's good), and post #6237053 (strange)- Your posts seem pretty acceptable.
As for my posts, I had a lot of confidence in post #6220249 getting approved. Why're most the approvers uninterested? post #6220260 a little less confidence but I thought the effort the artist put in was of good quality.
post #6138445
Is there something wrong with this post?
baconmeh2 said:
@Nuntokki Posts are always deleted for a reason. In this case, it'd be more accurate to say "My posts weren't approved".
Besides post #6223397 (a little barren and strange), post #6223429 (not a style i vibe with but it's good), and post #6237053 (strange)- Your posts seem pretty acceptable.As for my posts, I had a lot of confidence in post #6220249 getting approved. Why're most the approvers uninterested? post #6220260 a little less confidence but I thought the effort the artist put in was of good quality.
yeeh, am i like smol to smol
Nice to meet you, I made my first illustration submission on this danbooru and it was deleted.
What could have caused this, if you don't mind me asking.
These two were approved, but then they were flagged and rejected. The thing that bugs me is that other breast expansion artworks by this artist were approved, yet the two above weren't allowed to stay. Why is that?
I was wondering why none of these images from this pool were approved. As far as I can tell, the images were good, or at least, as good as it can get. Is there a reason why?
The pool in question: pool #20063
Lord_Seeker said:
I was wondering why none of these images from this pool were approved. As far as I can tell, the images were good, or at least, as good as it can get. Is there a reason why?
The pool in question: pool #20063
Where did you get them from? Most likely because they have no source.
