Posted under General
functi said:
Also for asshole who wrote this "(disinterest: Check for better versions before posting next time)" It was uploaded before pixiv version came
They most likely meant check the artist's pixiv, not check danbooru to see if a better version existed already. You could've been the one to upload the pixiv version.
Any reason this got deleted?
Also for this; The post in question has no jpeg artifacts when I compared it with the parent post. Did it got overlooked?
functi said:
post #6474175 post #6477172
Same pictures are reposted by purple posters from another source after mine posts and my posts got pruned, very coolAlso for asshole who wrote this "(disinterest: Check for better versions before posting next time)" It was uploaded before pixiv version came
That was me. You got 1upped, if you want to avoid that, you have to check if the artist posts on other platforms like Pixiv within 3 days of posting on Twitter.
EDIT: What Talulah said is valid, but generalizing, I think you can avoid that if you notice the artist posts .pngs so soon.
Updated
Individual said:
That was me. You got 1upped, if you want to avoid that, you have to check if the artist posts on other platforms like Pixiv within 3 days of posting on Twitter.
The Twitter version was posted two hours before the pixiv version was even available. There isn't any avoiding that, your just have to pray for an approver to approve it in time (or avoid uploading from Twitter as a restricted user, which is also shit).
Nacha said:
Misunderstood the "That was me." part of the message and already sent the message, before noticing my mistake. I apology for the accusation of course.
It's fine. For the record, I check every image I see, so I do approve posts even if a better version is available elsewhere (post #6457555, post #6443676...), but not here.
These are an official dakis post #6475672 post #6475682 post #6475693 post #6475699 post #6475697, there are already two of them already uploaded on the site post #6472129 post #6472128 , consistency, please?
Talulah said:
The Twitter version was posted two hours before the pixiv version was even available. There isn't any avoiding that, your just have to pray for an approver to approve it in time (or avoid uploading from Twitter as a restricted user, which is also shit).
Oh i`m sorry for not being a clairvoyant then
need professional advice on this post
post #6483333
I was wondering why this post got deleted, I've sent an appeal to get it approved
Ads129 said:
I was wondering why this post got deleted, I've sent an appeal to get it approved
of all posts you should've appealed post #6163304 instead though, it is bigger and was already uploaded months before by yourself, and you didn't even at least parent the newer post to the older one
What the hell, are you guys actually checking?
post #6482496
post #6481410
post #6480555
post #6480845
How strict is your definition of high quality?
Bad anatomy? It's hard to tell.
Can I please get some feedback on why post #6064794 got rejected by 15 reviewers? Like, what in the world is wrong with it?
So I'm nearing 9 pages of rejected posts, not gonna go through all of them but:
This is a 40k related one, and the previous art from the same artist went through fine.
Also related 40k stuff:
post #6114208
post #6134263
post #6196677
post #6163663
It's been ages since this artist's art has been approved which is weird because they're also of high quality I feel.
I didn't post this one, but again, same artist.
