Danbooru

Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

Mayhem-Chan said:

Let's not start to tag child/female child on S posts just because of an assumption based on a perceived ambiguity. Just be content with not tagging anything in those edge cases, it's fine, no reason to insist on tagging those when they are such contentious tags already (not to mention most people already voted in favor of getting rid of them). Caution is much better, let's not worsen the mess

I'm not insisting people use the tags. My point was that there's no clear evidence there was ever a decision to limit the child tag to G. Even if sexualized adults not interacting with the child are enough to disqualify the tag, at no point was violence discussed in the threads. The reason I brought those points up was because I didn't want to risk other users getting the wrong idea and start removing the tags from every S post they see without regard for whether the rating is due to sexual content, violence, or somethng else. Removing the tag from those posts without making a BUR would be premature at this stage. In any case, I don't want to risk causing any more misunderstandings, so I'll wait for the admins to speak for themselves if they decide to.

nkuylo said:

post #6580960
Marked as loli by a user with a single tag edit. On a day of creation of their account. Can't see a reason for that dedication.

Yeah, no, not loli. I don't know how anyone could assume this post was loli. The tag has been struck from the post already too, just going to show how pointless that one edit truly was.

sohibil said:

Should this post be tagged as Loli? There's nothing explicit going on and she's not even completely nude.

Basically it's just kid wearing a bikini casually wading in the sea.

A kid in a microbikini that's one stiff breeze away from revealing everything. That's loli.

Loli does not need to be rating:explicit.