post #6607764
nothing about the girl implies loli
Posted under General
post #6607764
nothing about the girl implies loli
post #6618306
post #6618308
post #6618309
tagged as loli but shouldn't be
viliml said:
post #6618306
post #6618308
post #6618309
tagged as loli but shouldn't be
Curious, why shouldn't they be? On my look it seems like an easy loli tag.
All four girls are clearly lolis.
Parent and sibling tagged loli.
Boys are clearly shotas. Girls could possibly be considered lolis, especially Cirno and Rumia.
Boys are clearly shotas. Eternity could possibly be considered a loli.
HeyThereGuy said:
All four girls are clearly lolis.
Parent and sibling tagged loli.
Boys are clearly shotas. Girls could possibly be considered lolis, especially Cirno and Rumia.
Boys are clearly shotas. Eternity could possibly be considered a loli.
I agree at least Flandre and Koishi count as loli in the first post.
The second one and the related posts might possibly qualify for petite instead of loli. Her body shape is obscured by the man's arms, but she does have medium breasts.
The third and fourth are definitely shota, and I believe the third post counts as loli. Eternity doesn't look prepubescent to me in the fourth post, but the shota tag is enough to censor the post regardless.
I understand why post #6631813 was tagged loli, but I was under the impression incidental exposure of bloomers don't need to be tagged as loli.
blindVigil said:
I would hardly describe that as incidental; the intent of the composition seems pretty unambiguous. I probably wouldn't give it much thought if it wasn't tagged loli, but I can certainly see why it is.
Fair enough. I do think there is a little room for plausible deniability, but it may be better to play it safe with that kind of presentation.
Does post #6642168 and post #6642169 count as loli?
denliner27 said:
Does post #6642168 and post #6642169 count as loli?
I say she appears just young enough to count and the posts definitely meet the suggestiveness criterion.
post #4090793 and its children are tagged loli while none of the artist’s other images of Flandre are despite her proportions being consistent across all of them.
Either that post and its children should be untagged or the artist’s other explicit Flandre posts should be tagged loli.
Personally I think she’s not a loli in any of them.
HeyThereGuy said:
post #4090793 and its children are tagged loli while none of the artist’s other images of Flandre are despite her proportions being consistent across all of them.
Either that post and its children should be untagged or the artist’s other explicit Flandre posts should be tagged loli.
Personally I think she’s not a loli in any of them.
I agree. I think the perspective is making the proportions seem smaller than they actually are.
Vasi1 said:
post #6614969
not loli. a shortstack, sure.
Most of the posts with this character seem to qualify as loli, so that may be why the tag was added (it was also tagged with oppai loli). There are a few posts in between the above post and the unambiguously loli posts, so someone may also want to check those.
Jigsy said:
A “yes” vote from me.
Jigsy said:
also yes
post #238869
Loli? S?