Danbooru

Fish implications

Posted under Tags

BUR #10869 has been rejected.

create implication moorish_idol -> fish
create implication bichir -> fish
create implication clownfish -> fish
create implication surgeonfish -> fish
create implication tuna -> fish
create implication anglerfish -> fish
create implication arowana -> fish
create implication angelfish -> fish
create implication oarfish -> fish
create implication puffer_fish -> fish
create implication sea_bream -> fish
create implication swordfish -> fish
create implication sunfish -> fish
create implication arapaima -> fish
create implication carp -> fish
create implication great_white_shark -> shark
create implication hammerhead_shark -> shark
create implication whale_shark -> shark

Several fish such as catfish and oddly enough coelacanth are already implied to fish while many fish with hundreds of tags aren't.
I understand the sake of not implying animals for the sake of furry personas but I think cases of anthropomorphized fish are fewer.
I've mainly included fish with a traditional fish-like body shape and not manta_ray or eel since they're unusual, and may not be what people would generally look for when searching fish

Hillside_Moose said:

There's an issue when it comes to edible fish like post #3346337, where you get crosstalk between fish the animal and fish_(food).

I agree it's an issue, but I don't find it particularly relevant to the BUR. Several fish are already implicated to fish, and the issue itself still exists even if existing implications to fish are removed and only generic unidentified fish can be tagged as fish.

I'm happy to help populate fish_(food) and depopulate food posts from the fish tag to help make the distinction clearer.

1