swimsuit tag implications

BUR #14324 has been rejected.

create implication competition_school_swimsuit -> one-piece_swimsuit

adding missing implication

FYI, you can just edit your first BUR to add this.

AngryZapdos said:

FYI, you can just edit your first BUR to add this.

I just tried adding it to my first request and got an error "Can't create implication competition_school_swimsuit -> one-piece_swimsuit (competition_school_swimsuit already implies one-piece_swimsuit through another implication)"

The only implications I could find are competition_school_swimsuit » school_swimsuit and competition_school_swimsuit » swimsuit
The only thing that school_swimsuit implies is swimsuit.

I assume you tried to do:

create implication school swimsuit -> one-piece swimsuit
create implication competition school swimsuit -> one-piece swimsuit

This doesn't work because competition school swimsuit already implies school swimsuit, so if school swimsuit is changed to imply one-piece swimsuit, then competition school swimsuit will automatically imply one-piece swimsuit too.

Yeah, he posted that exact line in topic #22903

Rejecting this because topic #22903 will already cover this if approved.

The bulk update request #14324 (forum #230041) has been rejected by @evazion.