Saber Alter Form implications

BUR #39933 has been rejected.

create implication artoria_pendragon_alter_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate) -> saber_alter
create implication santa_alter -> saber_alter

As I was suggested to do in the FGO implications thread I'm making a thread for this one, both of these characters are forms of specifically Saber Alter, so they should be under her and not just Saber IMO.

If this does go through the implications to the umbrella Artoria tag should be removed. As-is don't think the specific re-implication is necessary and the remaining Fate ""umbrella"" tags (Elizabeth Bathory, Mordred, Jeanne d'Arc, Jeanne d'Arc Alter) have other untangling issues and Artoria is the final boss of that.

Ylimegirl said:

If this does go through the implications to the umbrella Artoria tag should be removed. As-is don't think the specific re-implication is necessary and the remaining Fate ""umbrella"" tags (Elizabeth Bathory, Mordred, Jeanne d'Arc, Jeanne d'Arc Alter) have other untangling issues and Artoria is the final boss of that.

Can't you have implications under implications, so I'm suggesting the tag goes Artoria, Saber Alter, Santa Alter.

Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:

Can't you have implications under implications, so I'm suggesting the tag goes Artoria, Saber Alter, Santa Alter.

You can, but if you don't unimply the first implication it'll show up in the nested tree multiple times, like this:

artoria_pendragon_(fate)
↳ artoria_pendragon_alter_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate)
↳ saber_alter
  ↳ artoria_pendragon_alter_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate)

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

on the saber alter tag in general:feels kind of bad to have to be tagging a design not from fgo with specifically the fgo ascension tags?

tamuraakemi said:

on the saber alter tag in general:feels kind of bad to have to be tagging a design not from fgo with specifically the fgo ascension tags?

You have better qualifiers/searchability options to suggest then?

Ylimegirl said:

You have better qualifiers/searchability options to suggest then?

We don't tag normal Saber that way, for one. Don't know what could be done without fucking with FGO tags so probably not worth changing.

I did start populating Saber (first ascension) Saber (second ascension) and Saber (third ascension) a little while back in my maximalist tagging era. Kinda gave up, really the main issue is that all the gal servants from F/sn have a good amount of casual alts introduced in that game and hataraxia that we don't currently have a way of tagging beyond official alternate costume. it really isn't great that my best idea for saber's casual wear is naming it "anniversary blonde" after ritsuka's mystic code. I think once those are tagged it's probably safe-ish to nuke the first & second ascension tags for saber and salter.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #39933 (forum #347018) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.