bishopjulian1968 said:
Please make rating:safe return both general and suggestive posts, thanks.
Use rating:g,s or is:sfw.
Posted under General
bishopjulian1968 said:
Please make rating:safe return both general and suggestive posts, thanks.
Use rating:g,s or is:sfw.
DKN116 said:
So... In the past, if I wanted to only search non-SFW content, I'd put "blahblahblah tag(s)" and then "-rating:safe".
What do I have to type in now to get the same result?
rating:q,e or is:nsfw.
nonamethanks said:
Use rating:g,s or is:sfw.
For the sake of backward compatibility, please alias rating:safe to rating:g,s.
bishopjulian1968 said:
For the sake of backward compatibility, please alias rating:safe to rating:g,s.
that's exactly what is:sfw covers.
Based on the new system as explained in howto:rate, should the note in the sexually suggestive wiki be removed?
Whisky_and_Roses said:
Based on the new system as explained in howto:rate, should the note in the sexually suggestive wiki be removed?
Just changed the word Safe to Sensitive. Most sexually suggestive posts should remain rating:s at minimum.
magcolo said:
that's exactly what is:sfw covers.
Thank you, I understood that the first time, I am saying that the old tag rating:safe should mean what it always used to mean instead of being aliased to the new tag rating:suggestive, because any people (and software) still using the old tag are most likely expecting it to work as it did.
bishopjulian1968 said:
Thank you, I understood that the first time, I am saying that the old tag rating:safe should mean what it always used to mean instead of being aliased to the new tag rating:suggestive, because any people (and software) still using the old tag are most likely expecting it to work as it did.
rating:safe doesn't exist anymore, there is no alias. It still "works" as a search query because it starts with "rating:s", and so it returns rating:s posts (which are now suggestive) - much in the same way you can search rating:safe-ish_idk_this_is_pretty_suggestive_bro to get rating:s posts or rating:garbage_not_hentai to get rated G posts.
Old scripts, sites, and users have to update the way they fetch safe posts.
KagayakuShiningGate said:
And maybe some guidelines for drug usage depicted...? Like if it's off-limits for G or doesn't matter.
I'd like to second this if it hasn't been covered somewhere already. howto:rate currently covers suicide ("Depictions of thoughts of suicide or self-harm") so I think images like post #5200228 (attempted overdose) are currently covered.
My initial gut feeling on some examples:
A few ideas on how this might be handled:
post #3185583
is it S or G?
pantsukiller said:
post #3185583
is it S or G?
Looks G to me, the girl is barely the focus, let alone the thighhighs/zettai ryouiki.
nonamethanks said:
rating:q,e or is:nsfw.
Neither works with the blacklist
I tested, rating:sfw and rating:nsfw don't work. rating:q,e only brings rating:q (Probably because it reads it as rating:q*? Same thing happens with rating:g,s, but for g)
because I don't want to cause some kind of "rating change war" I would like to ask the following questions
in what rating does bare midriff fall? especially midriff peek
my doubt lies in the following post post #5039206
no underboob, no undewear, no ultra-tight clothing, just a regular shirt slightly short, just enough to show the navel and a little more.
sensitive or general?
also, if my question varies greatly depending on the situation, I would appreciate it if you could show me some examples, thank you.
tremolo_measure said:
because I don't want to cause some kind of "rating change war" I would like to ask the following questions
in what rating does bare midriff fall? especially midriff peek
my doubt lies in the following post post #5039206
no underboob, no undewear, no ultra-tight clothing, just a regular shirt slightly short, just enough to show the navel and a little more.
sensitive or general?
I’d say sensitive because it’s showing too much skin.