https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107961429
Something doesn't feel right about this one, namely the weirdly drawn chain necklace.
Posted under General
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107961429
Something doesn't feel right about this one, namely the weirdly drawn chain necklace.
Jerrpanese said:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107961429
Something doesn't feel right about this one, namely the weirdly drawn chain necklace.
Look at her knees.
Jerrpanese said:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/107961429
Something doesn't feel right about this one, namely the weirdly drawn chain necklace.
It has the Ai-Generated tag on Pixiv
8253803 said:
post #6067190
I know this artist offers PSD as paid reward, and I don't have a strong suspicion, but it still reminds me about AI's style.
Human artists can draw like that too. I see nothing suspicious at a glance.
Bionicman76 said:
post #6292032
There was no AI tag on pixiv, and I only noticed the weird hand after uploading.
Why are you asking here even though it’s already been discussed in the comments on that post? Just let it get auto-deleted after three days, unless you want to request a manual deletion before that.
kittey said:
Human artists can draw like that too. I see nothing suspicious at a glance.
Why are you asking here even though it’s already been discussed in the comments on that post? Just let it get auto-deleted after three days, unless you want to request a manual deletion before that.
Idk, this is my first encounter with uploading anything AI related
Marlor said:
They don't seem to involve enough human work to qualify as ai-assisted not ai-generated.
Pixiv's Fanbox moves to ban A.I
https://official-en.fanbox.cc/posts/5934381
This could help with reducing certain A.I submissions that were being monetized.
Updated
post #6296728 post #6296741 Ai-generated? I think they are.
Drimacus said:
post #6296728 post #6296741 Ai-generated? I think they are.
really safe to assume they are, all other recent uploads under this artist were, and all the ai-generated stuff looks very different from the old human-made works
Zankuro uses his own art for AI generation, I'm not sure what the appropriate tag would be for this situation.
post #6300289
Shading and coloring looks AI, it's also fairly different looking to the artist's previous works. The visible ear and foot also look odd.
wispydreamer said:
post #6300289
Shading and coloring looks AI, it's also fairly different looking to the artist's previous works. The visible ear and foot also look odd.
Yes, people pointed it out in the source, with no answer from the artist.
post #6292123
post #6244048
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/6281515
With the inconsistent shading and eye drawing style between images, weird lighting, out of character proportions and makeup and excessive skindentation from too many straps, this artist looks to use ai generation at base and touching it up to me.
quite the aggressive flag comment. I had to look closely at the hand placement but it seems like it could've just been a directional error with the right hand.
ricroll said:
quite the aggressive flag comment. I had to look closely at the hand placement but it seems like it could've just been a directional error with the right hand.
To me this just looks like a mistake, along with the shoulder still showing. (FWIW the artist also seems to dislike AI in general based on their Twitter, but that hasn't stopped people before).
I'm skeptical about it being AI gen or assisted. A leap in quality from recent works, unusual for the artist are watermarks and they also had a making-of on Twitter showing screenshots/different stages from the lineart to the finished illustration instead of the drawing process. I was going to make it into a media asset and add making-of available to the post but for some reason, they deleted it.
ricroll said:
quite the aggressive flag comment. I had to look closely at the hand placement but it seems like it could've just been a directional error with the right hand.
not gonna lie, the hair looks a lot more sus than the hands to me