kittey said:
These tools have been discussed on the forums before. AI detection is even more trash than AI generation. Don’t trust it.
Ah I see. Thanks.
Posted under General
ebora fooled us all: Check this: https://twitter.com/wormontheground/status/1670849210021822464
ebora uses AI: https://twitter.com/youngmanisdown/status/1670872236914524160
8253803 said:
Oh for the sake of all that's holy. By 2024 we'll get to "you either stream your painting process on YouTube and publish the VOD or you're using AI" level of witchhunting. How can an artist get a timelapse out of an already finished work?
https://twitter.com/amakidaisuke/status/1670855936532164608
This latest screen recording is quite convincing to me. It has all the brushstrokes and rough edges of a human-created PSD. The shading is done layer-by-layer. The ordering of the layers is logical. if anyone can name an AI which generates PSD that looks like this, I might change my mind, but for now I believe it's fully human.
That's the same video they deleted earlier and I was trying to put into words, don't ask me, I laughed at the timelapse comment too. Hive was indeed the basis for this stuff on Twitter. But anyway, the post has been approved.
EDIT:
Maiden_in_Orange said:
Edit: Sorry Individual. I wasn't sure if you knew, and that wasn't my place to talk in the first place.
It's fine.
Updated
Individual said:
the basis for this stuff on Twitter.
Bruh, this guy may be right but he's so rude.
Imo post #6413310 and other his posts look nothing but AI to me, nothing changes with layers. (Why using 3+ colors on 1 layer? That's pretty uncomfortable)
Updated
Marlor said:
Bruh, this guy may be right but he's so rude.
This guy needs to publish a paper on some reputable machine learning journal about the reliability of this AI detection tool they trust more than their own eyes, before they're worth taking seriously. I've just seen with my own eyes how unreliable tools like this are:
8253803 said:
I tested it using a PSD from an artist's Patreon, exporting two images with backgrounds on / off, and noticed that this tool spits out false positive when the image has a background? Yeah gotta be careful when using this tool.
background on: post #6404534, 73.8%
background off: https://files.catbox.moe/8m4m2r.png, 3.1%
Marlor said:
Why using 3+ colors on 1 layer? That's pretty uncomfortable
Did they? The layers are all organized as flat colors first, and then highlights and shadows on top of that. Smaller components might be done in one layer because they're simple, but skin and clothes are both layered in a way that a human would.
8253803 said:
Did they?
https://twitter.com/amakidaisuke/status/1667506378687287296 - 0:32 - 0:34 - all hair shadow on 1 layer and there's lots of different colors
Btw same for skin, back hair, ears - for everything, lol, everything's on 1 layer, except some details like blush and highlights
Updated
Marlor said:
https://twitter.com/amakidaisuke/status/1667506378687287296 - 0:32 - 0:34 - all hair shadow on 1 layer and there's lots of different colors
Btw same for skin, back hair, ears - for everything, lol, everything's on 1 layer, except some details like blush and highlights
Points taken, but personally not gonna make a final call on this.
BobTheBuilder_v1 said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/media_assets/13005637
https://danbooru.donmai.us/media_assets/13007487
Artist talked about using Stable Diffusion for the background in their previous work https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/109071720 , but also mentioned in the comment section of https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/109168028 that the characters were rendered using Blender and the girl's body had to be fixed with a JPEG in post due to Blender problems.
effect488 - says ai-assisted, but looks ai-generated to me
hdk5 said:
effect488 - says ai-assisted, but looks ai-generated to me
Bad default AI
"I used Ai in the drawing process, but it's not entirely made of Ai"
Fraud.
post #6416355
Flag but no tag.
ion288 said:
post #6416355
Flag but no tag.
definitely ai-assisted, the messy details on the guns and clothes are a giveaway
ion288 said:
post #6416355
Flag but no tag.
The guy himself posted this on his Twitter.
(And also check out his other tweets)
VR-Man said:
The guy himself posted this on his Twitter.
(And also check out his other tweets)
*Saw this message on danbooru
You know anon, I purposefully didnt try to make it look human because frankly I dont care. The Fn fal piece I make no one recognize it as AI, and for you to come here and to be like "oh watch out is AI" seem a bit clowney to me.
Did they also "purposefully" leave the incorrect number of fingers as-is? Like, the easiest mistake to spot and the most trivial to correct? LMFAO.
Post is haphazardly tagged, composition of the image is off, and the head looks like it's superimposed over generic AI-generated body to me.
TrueKringe said:
Post is haphazardly tagged, composition of the image is off, and the head looks like it's superimposed over generic AI-generated body to me.
Shading looks like classic AI shading, along with the other signs you've mentioned.
Drimacus said:
ebora uses AI: https://twitter.com/youngmanisdown/status/1670872236914524160
No, ebora doesn't use AI. They traced a few of their artworks from AI pictures. It's a shitty thing to do but no AI was involved in their own drawings. Please read the statement more carefully next time. You can put the ai-assisted tag on the pictures he traced though.
Talulah said:
Her left hand, the fingers of her right hand and the budget sarashi have been crudely painted over. Considering that everything else looks “perfect”, I’d vote for AI with a bad attempt at fixing things.
