Posted under General
kittey said:
Her left hand, the fingers of her right hand and the budget sarashi have been crudely painted over. Considering that everything else looks “perfect”, I’d vote for AI with a bad attempt at fixing things.
Yeah, the sarashi in particular looked weird to me. Also looks a bit blurry which I've noticed happens frequently with AI generations. If that's AI-assisted I'm suspicious of post #6404623 as well. Asta in particular looks poorly cropped out of a background and pasted onto a bed.
Talulah said:
If that's AI-assisted I'm suspicious of post #6404623 as well. Asta in particular looks poorly cropped out of a background and pasted onto a bed.
AI-“assisted”…
post #6404623 has the same shoddy editing on the hands/fingers. Just set the gamma to 0.2 and it’ll be obvious.
So a picture i recently uploaded was tagged as Ai generated.
post #6437396
Can anyone confirm if it is Ai-generated?
Updated
fsnfanboy said:
So a picture i recently uploaded was tagged as Ai generated.
post #6437396Can anyone if it is Ai-generated?
Everything from that Twitter is AI.
fsnfanboy said:
So a picture i recently uploaded was tagged as Ai generated.
post #6437396Can anyone confirm if it is Ai-generated?
To be honest it's kinda glaring with the hair strand themselves and also the dress collar warping from one side of the strands of hair to the other
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/12895523
Could this artist be using AI assistance? Coloring and some details look a bit like AI, but some other details look human.
8253803 said:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/12895523
Could this artist be using AI assistance? Coloring and some details look a bit like AI, but some other details look human.
Don't know to what extent they edit the pics, but i'm pretty sure there is AI involved
https://pixiv.net/en/artworks/109354960
enlarging the image there are several spots that either have AI-shenanigans or look like sloppily painted-on AI, and there's also the hair ornament which is very artifact-y, and the tiara which just looks way too sus.
But there's way too much contrast between the perfectly clean areas and the sloppy ones, this screams painted-on AI to me
Mayhem-Chan said:
Don't know to what extent they edit the pics, but i'm pretty sure there is AI involved
https://pixiv.net/en/artworks/109354960
enlarging the image there are several spots that either have AI-shenanigans or look like sloppily painted-on AI, and there's also the hair ornament which is very artifact-y, and the tiara which just looks way too sus.
But there's way too much contrast between the perfectly clean areas and the sloppy ones, this screams painted-on AI to me
Yeah, probably safe to tag at least the recent works of sugiki as ai-assisted. I've added the tag to all posts starting from post #6182588 to the latest.
Seems legit, but those asymmetric straps keep bugging me. Why there is two different width on the right and only only one thin on the left? Is there top like this? Her breast shape also a bit strange. And her choker's heart oriented straightly vertical despite her neck tilt.
nkuylo said:
Seems legit, but those asymmetric straps keep bugging me. Why there is two different width on the right and only only one thin on the left? Is there top like this? Her breast shape also a bit strange. And her choker's heart oriented straightly vertical despite her neck tilt.
Seems totally legit to me, women's fashion is confusing and odd, I have in fact seen a top like that. Everything else looks like a typical artist's mistake.
Might be ai-assisted similar to AztoDio's.
MegaFlare said:
Might be ai-assisted similar to AztoDio's.
I would argue it's almost completely AI, that blue inner hair is a common AI error, and if he didn't even clean that up, I doubt much else is edited. The shading is also typical AI shading all the way through. The head and face looks completely AI, unlike the slightly more unique style shown in AztoDio's works, which nudges his stuff into assisted instead of generated.
wispydreamer said:
I would argue it's almost completely AI, that blue inner hair is a common AI error, and if he didn't even clean that up, I doubt much else is edited. The shading is also typical AI shading all the way through. The head and face looks completely AI, unlike the slightly more unique style shown in AztoDio's works, which nudges his stuff into assisted instead of generated.
I also lean a lot more towards ai-generated as the resolution doesn't help the case, even worse with the clash between this post and every previous post under the same artist
Crowd has weird faces so I'm weary of uploading anything by the artist.
punished_K said:
Crowd has weird faces so I'm weary of uploading anything by the artist.
Background's definitely AI, and there are some funky fingers on the main girl as well.
punished_K said:
Crowd has weird faces so I'm weary of uploading anything by the artist.
Everything on this account looks very much fully AI, both the backgrounds and the characters.
MegaFlare said:
Might be ai-assisted similar to AztoDio's.
They abandoned their Pixiv and Twitter accounts for 2 years and then resumed posting with very ai-looking images in completely different art styles. This is probably a more cynical action than that of AztoDio.
Low-res, grainy image with offline source as usual. The image looks like someone tried to use anime-esque AI indrawing over realistic image, hence the clash in design as "anime girl's" face stuck out like a sore thumb and the weird thing going on around the character's jacket and fingers.
TrueKringe said:
Low-res, grainy image with offline source as usual. The image looks like someone tried to use anime-esque AI indrawing over realistic image, hence the clash in design as "anime girl's" face stuck out like a sore thumb and the weird thing going on around the character's jacket and fingers.
You're right. Look at the uploader's two most recent images.
Probably another AI sockpuppet. The account were only registered today and they are attempting to upload the same AI image when previous one are deleted.
